Build an AI GitHub PR Reviewer in Under 10 Minutes
Deploy an autonomous agent that analyzes every pull request, catches bugs before merge, enforces coding standards, and posts structured feedback directly on GitHub — without a human reviewer in the loop.
Key Metrics
Why It Matters
Engineering teams lose hours every week waiting on code reviews, and critical defects slip through when reviewers are overloaded. An AI PR reviewer gives every pull request the same rigorous, consistent analysis — instantly, at any time of day — so engineers can ship confidently and focus on building.
Works With Your Dev Stack
Connect your repositories, communication tools, and project trackers — Architect integrates natively with the platforms your engineering team already uses.
Platform Capabilities
Architect provides every capability you need to build a production-grade AI PR reviewer — from code diff parsing to multi-tool action execution.
How It Works
From pull request open to reviewed in seconds — four automated steps, zero human bottlenecks.
Before vs After Architect
See exactly what changes when you automate your pull request review process with an Architect agent.
- PRs wait 2-3 days for a human reviewer to become available
- Senior engineers spend 30-40% of their time on manual code reviews
- Security issues and logic bugs slip through during peak delivery periods
- Review quality is inconsistent — depends on the reviewer and their workload
- Every PR receives a first review within seconds of opening — day or night
- Senior engineers focus on architecture decisions, not mechanical review tasks
- Security vulnerabilities and critical bugs are caught before they reach production
- Consistent, policy-driven review quality across every PR in every repository
Sample Agent Prompt
This is the system prompt you configure inside Architect to define your AI GitHub PR Reviewer agent's behavior, scope, and output format.
You are an expert code reviewer integrated into a GitHub pull request workflow. When a pull request is opened or updated, you will: 1. Retrieve the full code diff and file list from the GitHub API. 2. Analyze each changed file for: logic errors, security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), style violations against the project's .eslintrc / .pylintrc, and missing test coverage. 3. Post inline review comments on specific lines using the GitHub Review API. 4. Output a structured review summary with: severity (critical / warning / suggestion), file path, line number, and a concise actionable description per finding. 5. If any CRITICAL findings exist, submit a "REQUEST_CHANGES" review decision. 6. If no issues are found, submit an "APPROVE" decision with a summary comment. 7. Notify the #engineering Slack channel with a review link and finding count. Always be specific, cite line numbers, and suggest a fix — never just flag without guidance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ship Faster. Review Smarter.
Build your AI GitHub PR Reviewer agent in under 10 minutes with Architect. No code. No infrastructure. Just results from day one.
Start Building FreeNo credit card required — <10 min setup time